WisdomAUREA Leaders

You Can Be in the Right Room and Still Leave a Stranger.

You go to the event. The speakers are good. You have three genuine insights. And you go home having met nobody, because nothing in the room was designed to connect the people in it.

You Can Be in the Right Room and Still Leave a Stranger.

The best rooms you get into are usually wasted, and not for the reason you think.

Why do you leave good events without real connections?

Because those rooms are built for personal growth, not for connection. Everyone faces the front, the value flows from the stage, and nothing in the design connects the people sitting next to each other.

Jasmin Terrany said it out loud from an AUREA stage, to a room of people who had paid to be there: "I have a love-hate relationship with events like these. I come and I listen and I have these beautiful moments. And I also feel really awkward and alone. Are you my people? We're all a bunch of strangers in this room."

Her follow-up is the part that stings: "We're just going to be here at another event, have these beautiful moments, and then all go home to our lives. And then what?"

What are the three levels of conversation?

Level one is logistics and weather. What do you do, where are you from, how was the flight. Nobody enjoys it and everybody does it.

Level two is feelings and opinions. What happened, who said what, what you think about it. It creates genuine closeness, which is why it is everywhere. It does not make either person better.

Jasmin's diagnosis of what that produces at scale is worth sitting with: "That's why we have such a society of drama. We're doing level two conversations to create connection, but not with any real intention to elevate as a result."

Level three is intentional. Both people know why they are talking and what they would like to leave with. It is rare because naming it feels strange, not because it is difficult.

Why level two feels like closeness but isn't

Level two produces the sensation of intimacy without the altitude. You have been vulnerable, you have been heard, and nothing about either of you has changed.

This is why people can have a rich social life and still feel unseen. Shared complaint is genuinely bonding. It is also completely stable. It can run for years without either person moving.

The test is simple: after a good long conversation, can you name one thing you will do differently? If the answer is consistently no, the relationship is warm and level two, and it may be exactly what you want. It is just not what you are missing.

How do you start a level three conversation?

Say out loud that you would like it to be one. That is the entire technique, and the awkwardness of it is the price.

Jasmin's version: this is a bit strange, I don't know you, so. What would you like to get out of this conversation? Her own acknowledgement of how that lands: "Nobody talks like that. That's weird. But we all want it, so let's do it."

Her reason for the standard is arithmetic rather than precious: "The only thing I get in this life is this moment, and I'm sharing it with you. I have a standard for the moments in my life."

The four moves that make someone feel heard

Level three requires actual listening, which is a skill with steps rather than a personality trait.

Reflect. "That must feel like…" or "It sounds like…" Not "you should," and not "well, when I…"

Clarify. "Can you tell me more about that?" You are opening it further, not closing it down.

Summarise. Give it back and check you have it. Hearing your own thought returned accurately is startlingly satisfying and almost nobody does it.

Ask what they need. This is the one everyone skips. Do not assume they want solutions. Ask. And if you have advice, ask permission before delivering it. Most unwanted advice is not badly meant; it was simply never requested.

The exercise you can run this week

Three people, one prompt, two minutes each. One person talks. The others only listen. No fixing, no advising, no relating it back to themselves. Then swap.

Jasmin used the prompt belonging. When time was up she could not get the room back into their seats. One woman did the exercise beside her husband and learned something about his inner life she had not known.

Two minutes. It works on a video call as well as it worked in that room, and it costs nothing but the willingness to be slightly strange for six minutes.

Frequently asked questions

Isn't this a bit much for a casual conversation?

Level three is not for every interaction and it is not a personality. It is for the moments you have deliberately set aside: an event, a call with someone you admire, a friendship you want to be real. Most people's problem is not too much depth; it is that they never once chose it.

What if the other person doesn't want to go there?

Then you have learned something quickly and kindly, which is its own result. Asking what someone wants from a conversation gives them an easy exit as well as an invitation. Most people, in our experience, are relieved someone finally asked.

How is this different from just being a good listener?

Good listening is one half. Level three also requires stating the intention up front, so both people know the conversation is meant to go somewhere. Without that, excellent listening still produces a very pleasant level two.

Can I use this in my own community or team?

Yes, and it transfers well. We run the three-person exercise in our own Gatherings with credit to Jasmin. The format is deliberately simple: one prompt, timed turns, nobody fixing anybody. Which is what lets it work with people who have just met.


Back to Wisdom